re: CBS & USA Today Articles - "not good things (are coming to LSU)"

quote:

---

You should remove the word "law" from your name. The point I made was there is no requirement for acceptance of the offer for it to be considered a violation.

---

And you should learn to exercise some reading comprehension.

Nothing in what I said or that the rule says talks about "acceptance of the offer." Rather, the rule states that it has to be an offer of financial aid or some benefit. What I'm stating is that based on what we know, Wade merely said the word offer, but did nothing to identify what it is an offer of.

quote:

---

However, based on the context of the conversation (and basic common sense), WW was referring to a monetary offer.

---

I never said that he wasn't likely referring to that. In fact, I specifically stated that it is easy to assume or infer that is what he is talking about. But an inference is just that; it does not conclude that he was talking about an offer of financial aid or a benefit.

quote:

---

And the NCAA (like most intelligent people) will infer WW was offering money.

---

They can infer all they want. What I'm saying, like many, is that if they base their NOA and subsequent penalties based solely on that statement alone and an inference, then it is complete and total bullshite!