- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Diving deeper on Standard Lithium?
Posted on 5/15/24 at 2:27 pm to Pierre
Posted on 5/15/24 at 2:27 pm to Pierre
quote:
Absolute worst case scenario, SLI just got a $160M investment for 45% of the company. That's a $350 mil valuation which should put the share price over $2. So if you're reading this in the most pessimistic way possible, share price should still be 60% higher. In reality, SLI just got $160M (with $30M cash up front) to fund near term operations and development that is no strings attached. No repayment, no interest, no nothing. It's a good faith down payment. Equinor will fund 45% of the capex for SWA Ark ($600M) and 45% of the capex for East TX (who knows, probably represents north of $1B extremely conservatively). That basically represents a back of the napkin $2B investment for 45% of the company assuming success, or a valuation of 4.4 billion. $25/share.
For reference, SLI’s published implied valuation of the deal was $300M
Just tried to figure out where our discrepancy was and it looks like SLI’s valuation discounts the $60M for the workplan as those are project payments. SLI only owns 55% of the projects so technically only realize $33M of the $60M commitment. So SLI will see $133M from this deal, not $160. Pre-FID.
This post was edited on 5/15/24 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:10 am to Fe_Mike
If AOGC ends up setting an obnoxiously high royalty rate like 10%, do you folks think SWA will be financially viable?
I think someone from SLI quoted before AOGC that 1A will not be viable at that high royalty rate.
I think someone from SLI quoted before AOGC that 1A will not be viable at that high royalty rate.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News