Started By
Message

re: 4-2-5 vs 3-4 and Stopping the Spread

Posted on 5/6/20 at 5:36 pm to
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278816 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

I think in a vacuum I'd prefer the 3-4, but at a place like LSU I lean more towards the 4-2-5 based on the type of athletes we recruit.



The numbers are different, but in the end the personnel is going to be relatively the same. LSU rarely played in a base 3-4 to begin with.

You have a big OLB that is like a DE. You have another that is your pass rusher who would usually also be a DE.

You have hybrid safeties like Jacoby Stevens that is like an extra LB in either alignment. So if you go to 4-2-5 you essentially have a 3rd LB regardless. If Chaisson or Arden Key are the 4th man on the line, does it really matter if his hand is down or he is standing up?


Key part of the article:

A college defense can get away with only have 1 pure edge rusher on the field for early downs. Most Tite front coordinators will bring in a 2nd or 3rd pass rusher when they can get the offense behind the sticks.
Posted by southdowns84
Member since Dec 2009
1454 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

The numbers are different, but in the end the personnel is going to be relatively the same. LSU rarely played in a base 3-4 to begin with.


I misspoke. I meant Aranda’s scheme vs Pelini. Aranda was much more read and react, which I don’t think properly takes advantage of our athletes. I think it’s much better employed at a place like Wisconsin or Baylor.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram