Started By
Message

Can we have a “Leveraged ETF’s: explained” thread?

Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:29 am
Posted by prostyleoffensetime
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2009
11484 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:29 am
My brother (who has a mentality that one of these days he’ll throw a $100 bill in the air and it will magically come down with 3 extra zeros on it) calls me with this shite sometimes: “JNUG was up 17% today!”

Me: “Cool. I have no clue how that shite works, but good luck. My AAPL was up 2.75%.”

Then I come here and see stuff like JNUG, GUSH, SQQQ, etc. brought up occasionally and I go google a little and come to the conclusion that they’re more volatile than a freshman girlfriend, but I still don’t know exactly why... Makes a guy curious, so I thought an ELI5 type post would be interesting.

For the record I’m not interested in making these things anymore than something to have fun with when I have a couple hundred extra dollars every now and then, but it does seem like it would be worth a shot sometimes.
Posted by tenderfoot tigah
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2004
10435 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:37 am to
The value of the leveraged ETF degrades over time. I don't completely understand how the degradation works, but it makes holding leveraged ETF's a bad play. Get in and out quickly. I personally prefer options if we are going for leveraged or riskier money.
Posted by Titan
Member since Apr 2008
2471 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:40 am to
strictly for day trading. Holding it longer than that will result in substantial loss
Posted by juice4lsu
Member since Dec 2007
3696 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:44 am to
Why to not buy leveraged ETFs:

1. They are very expensive.

2. There is nothing you can buy to get 3xS&P500, so they use many complex strategies to attempt to achieve this. Most folks would think volatility is your friend, but when using option strategies and being forced to rebalance to match an index in some cases on a daily basis, volatility up or down usually creates much more losses than gains.

3. Leverage cuts both ways, but protecting on the downside could be argued is more valuable than outperformance on the updside. Why? If you lose 10% value, it will take about 11% gain to get back to even. A 25% loss needs a 33% gain, a 50% loss needs a 100% gain, and an 80% loss needs a 500% gain.

TLDR - Don't buy leveraged ETFs for the long term
Posted by hottub
Member since Dec 2012
3376 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 11:32 am to
Example of leveraged decay:

3xleveraged ETF value is $10

The correlated index goes up 10%, 3x value goes up 30%. Total value is now $13

Next day, same correlated index goes down 10%, therefore 30% for 3x leveraged etf. Total value is now $9.10.

You lost 9% of your value because of the decay.

Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
3138 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 12:22 pm to
If you can emotionally stomach the volatility, leveraged ETFs can be effectively used. It's not for the lay person because it is extremely risky (but not because of the 'seesaw action' decay described by others because the market typically goes up more than it goes down; keep in mind that 'decay' math works the same way for 'growth'). I trade my leveraged ETF once a quarter, selling highs and buying lows. I've done extremely well and my losses during the downturn are just something you need to be able to handle. I know the risks and choose to play the game. It's been a winner for me.
This post was edited on 4/30/20 at 12:23 pm
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 5:38 pm to
Think about it like this. Assume you have a leveraged ETF that targets a 2x return on an index. Assume both the index and the ETF have a starting value of 100.

If the index goes down 10%, it’s value will be 90. Since the ETF is meant to return 2x the index, it will go down 20% to 80.

So far, we have no problem.

However, consider now the return needed to get back to breakeven for the index:

The index must increase 11.1% (100/90) to get back to 100.

Now look what happens to the 2x leveraged ETF:

If the index returned 11.1%, the ETF will have returned 22.2%, but 80 times 1.222 is only 97.8, as opposed to the full 100.

So even though the index is back to breakeven, you’re still 2.2% in the hole on your leveraged ETF. Wash and repeat many times and it becomes an asset that wastes away over time, particularly as volatility increases.

Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21057 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 5:41 pm to
DDM anyone
Posted by blackoutdore
Nashville
Member since Jun 2013
247 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 9:11 pm to
These leverage ETFs try to put a multiple on daily returns. Depending on the daily sequence of returns, even if the underlier is up, the leveraged fund can be down. This unpredictability makes them unattractive for the vast majority of investors- not only do you have to gauge whether something is going up or down (which is hard enough), but also the daily gyrations that lead to that conclusion (which may as well be impossible). That’s why most people who use these things for a real purpose other than “it’s worked out for me” are hedgers looking for a daily position.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 5/1/20 at 10:51 am to
I know I bought JETS, TNA, and UPRO at their trough and sold a couple days ago and made a good bit of money.

I have autobuy orders on all 3 if they get near their 52 week low again.

They aren't meant to hold long term.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram