re: The potential fallout of the priest scandal

quote:

---

You’re right, they’ve been totally forthcoming lol

---

Again, you are conflating previous acts with this one.

quote:

---

IWhat do you think this alleged issue is about, again? Did we read the same article?

---

Yes, I read the article. I recognized that this is a charge meant to achieve a goal by an attorney. And, you were absolutely taken by the hysterical charges of coverup but didn't even slow down enough to actually realize what is going on here.

No matter what you think of the church (irrelevant), or the behavior of some clergy (obviously dispicable), or whether or not their action are sufficient (reasonably debatable), this act of disclosure is by definition a step towards transparency. It's meant to bring transparency when, historically, that didn't exist. And, apparently, Gayle and the Saints played some role in assisting the Church from a PR standpoint to make it happen.

You are acting like the Saints and the Church have made decisions to hide the names of specific individuals. What's happening is that they have drawn the line in the sand and have decided to not publish everything because they know some of these charges are bogus.

If Gayle was trying to cover up for a friend, or favorite priest, you might have a point. Instead, the Saints are actually helping move the Church towards transparency.

But, your feeble emotional little mind conflated that with the original abuses themselves and the historical coverup in the Church.