- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hey will you racist Trump baws vote for me bc I love you now
Posted on 1/27/20 at 11:36 am to roadGator
Posted on 1/27/20 at 11:36 am to roadGator
In candor, responding in kind to the sort of idiot that started this exchange works as a bit of a catharsis for me,
You are correct. In court, I simply cannot call an idiot an idiot, so I must continue to employ reason against even the dumbest conceivable arguments. I admit that it just feels good sometimes to tell a fricking retard exactly how stupid he really is.
It really is not that different from the typical Trump pep rally poster who starts two threads per week verbally fellating Trump. For whatever reason, it makes them feel good, too.
I generally avoid those threads, and it would be nice if the pep rally posters would reciprocate by avoiding the threads in which people are trying to have an objective discussion of policy or a reasoned analysis of a given issue. They don’t, and it is generally the pep rally posters who send us off on these pointless tangents.
The difference from the courtroom analogy is that (in a courtroom), I am usually presenting a case to one person ... who is generally intelligent and generally trying to be objective. Yes, there are posters here who are intelligent and there are posters who try to be objective, but it is my experience that both are in the distinct minority. The pep rally posters outnumber them by a significant margin.
You are correct. In court, I simply cannot call an idiot an idiot, so I must continue to employ reason against even the dumbest conceivable arguments. I admit that it just feels good sometimes to tell a fricking retard exactly how stupid he really is.
It really is not that different from the typical Trump pep rally poster who starts two threads per week verbally fellating Trump. For whatever reason, it makes them feel good, too.
I generally avoid those threads, and it would be nice if the pep rally posters would reciprocate by avoiding the threads in which people are trying to have an objective discussion of policy or a reasoned analysis of a given issue. They don’t, and it is generally the pep rally posters who send us off on these pointless tangents.
The difference from the courtroom analogy is that (in a courtroom), I am usually presenting a case to one person ... who is generally intelligent and generally trying to be objective. Yes, there are posters here who are intelligent and there are posters who try to be objective, but it is my experience that both are in the distinct minority. The pep rally posters outnumber them by a significant margin.
This post was edited on 1/27/20 at 11:38 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)