- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: South Korea’s Military Discharges Its First Transgender Soldier
Posted on 1/23/20 at 3:14 pm to upgrayedd
Posted on 1/23/20 at 3:14 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
We have to hail these people as heroes and any criticism of them is going to soon be deemed a crime.
We dont have to hail anyone as a hero. As of yet its not a crime to criticize anyone. I can go out on the street and call a black man the n-word to his face and nothing legally can happen to me. We are getting off into the weeds here. I guess my opinion is if a transgender person wants to serve their country and is otherwise deemed a mentally healthy individual I dont see why they should be denied the privileged to do so.. and so far I havent heard any reason that is compelling for them not to be allowed to serve..
This post was edited on 1/23/20 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 1/23/20 at 3:25 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
We dont have to hail anyone as a hero. As of yet its not a crime to criticize anyone. I can go out on the street and call a black man the n-word to his face and nothing legally can happen to me. We are getting off into the weeds here.
I'm simply pointing out that we're laying the groundwork for this to happen in the future. Its already starting to happen in the UK.
quote:
I guess my opinion is if a transgender person wants to serve their country and is otherwise deemed a mentally healthy individual I dont see why they should be denied the privileged to do so.. and so far I havent heard any reason that is compelling for them not to be allowed to serve..
I think having that condition in and of itself is reason not to let them serve. If these people have a 40% suicide rate before even experiencing the stresses of combat, then the juice isn't worth the squeeze. These issues can lead to a compromise of unit cohesion.
It's no different than not allowing women in combat. Can some of them qualify? Perhaps, but it's not worth the restructuring or worth the risks they pose in order to accept such a small percentage.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News