Ms. Lindsey offers Hearings on Ukraine separate from Impeachment

Ms. Lindsey (or maybe he’s based Lindsey in this case) has offered to have Rudy testify about the Ukraine nonsense outside of Impeachment. I think this is an interesting strategy, and could certainly result in the testimony of Hunter Biden and Joe Biden, which I find to be crucial.

Additionally,

quote:

---

Rumor has it that @RudyGiuliani has evidence on more than just the Bidens.

---

Tweet from a Guy that’s followed by some typically reliable sauces of info

Ms. Lindsey is on record saying he’s interested in having Rudy tell the Senate Judiciary committee what he’s unearthed.

quote:

---

“Rudy, if you want to come and tell us what you found, I'll be glad to talk to you,” Graham said. “We can look at what Rudy's got and Joe Biden, Hunter Biden and anything else you want to look at after impeachment. But if Rudy wants to come to the Judiciary Committee and testify about what he found, he's welcome to do so.”

---

POLITICO article ref to in Tweet

Ordinarily I think that Congressional Hearings are a total fricking waste of time. However, in this case, I kind of like it.

1) trump is battling a propaganda war of leftists speaking debunkness of “Ukraine conspiracy theories” into existence. Rudy could expose these assholes thru a senate hearing (esp if more witnesses than Rudy are called). And no reason it would have to be ltd to Ukraine itself, or just the Biden’s (Cuz frick John Kerry, his loser stepson, and Kerry’s traitorous dealings with Iran).

2) This would allow a quick trial of these ludicrous impeachment charges. The benefits of trying quickly is that it won’t detract from Trump’s true accomplishments (trade/economy, et al), in a way that provides NO credibility to this horseshite nonsense the Ds will impeach him on. It will allow Trump to campaign on accomplishments IN ADDITION TO Democrats are lunatics. However, Trump should maintain the ability to capitalize on how badly the Ds have discredited themselves and expose how corrupt the really are. I say they do a quick trial by calling the Eric Whistleblower Ciamarella, the budget guy that the Ds didn’t call in public bc what he said was probably really bad for them, Adam Schiff and Mr. Vindman; but rely on the dumb testimony of the idiot knowldgeless bureaucrats and left wing law professors, with Justice Roberts excluding all the hearsay nonsense.

That way Trump provides evidence to the jurors, and more significantly the public, of what a sham the House process was, and also provides exculpatory evidence. With this strategy, Trump could get a dismissal of impeachment and an acquittal as a result within a wk. This means the Ds wouldn’t even be able to use the stupid scarlet letter “I” tattoo to campaign against Trump.

Ms. Lindsey could start his judiciary hearings sometime around March and extend them thru the summer to make sure all the Deep State shenanigans remains front and center during election season.

3) None of the above would stop Durham or Barr from prosecuting the bad actors and I know many of my fellow PoliBaws don’t believe, but I truly trust Barr to make sure the guilty are prosecuted.