- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I’d Like to Hear Some Arguments Why the ID of the Whistleblower is Necessary
Posted on 11/24/19 at 4:40 pm to Huevos
Posted on 11/24/19 at 4:40 pm to Huevos
quote:
Heard a GOP pundit rationalize the necessity of revealing the whistleblower’s identity by saying “if someone yells fire and you look over and there is actually a fire, you want to know who first saw the fire.” Not sure I understand his argument there
This is a stupid argument, I agree.
The point is that the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower. He coordinated with Schiff on the "whistleblow," and the Dems do not want him under oath testifying to the obvious related questions.
The whistleblower is well known. This is why the Senate trial will not happen. It will explode in the faces of the DNC.
ETA: you claim to be independent/moderate... why does the Republican attempt to expose the whistleblower push you toward the Dems, yet the mockery of the Judicial system, disregard for the Constitution, and absolute derangement of the Dems not move your needle?
This post was edited on 11/24/19 at 4:44 pm
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)