Started By
Message

re: Jrue's Future

Posted on 11/21/19 at 3:00 pm to
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
39267 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Curious as to why you for sure have Didi and NAW in there, yet left out Frank Jackson

because frank jackson is a replacement level player.
the others are not replaceable without using a high asset to do it
Posted by LilWezyAna
BR
Member since Feb 2016
3145 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

because frank jackson is a replacement level player

A 21 year old athletic scorer and hustle player than shoots 35% from 3 should not be written off as less of an asset than Didi is all I’m saying. I see good value in a young bench player that knows his role, and seems like he is content in his role and doesnt think he’s irrationally better than he is. He’s also by all accounts a good locker room presence and has been a leader for our rookies (even though he’s 21).

I feel like if he were a 1st rounder instead of a 2nd rounder he wouldnt be deemed “replacement level” yet
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram