- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Motor Trend tests C8 Corvette : 0-60: 2.8, 1/4 mi 11.1
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:50 pm to TigrrrDad
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:50 pm to TigrrrDad
Likewise, I'll reiterate what I've said in the past about the C8 as someone who bought a C7 Grand Sport in April despite following the progress of the C8 very closely. The only thing I dislike about the C7 is the amount of "cheap" plastic on it - particularly all the vents in the rear of the car. But I can tolerate them on the C7 because it still looks like a Corvette.
The C8 looks just a bit too exotic for the price in my opinion. It looks closer to a Ferrari or Lambo than a Vette, yet is a $60K with a shite ton of plastic components - that gives it a "kit car" feel to me. Anyone familiar with the "kit car" craze in the late '70s/early '80s knows what I mean. I would rather if the exotic looking car was a $100K+ offshoot (e.g., Zora) and not the next version of the Vette (C8). A car that looks like that shouldn't cost $60K - it just doesn't feel right to me.
That being said, the performance is phenomenal and frankly almost too good to be true for the price tag. It's a straight up game changer for the sports car industry and redefines expectations for all manufacturers. That alone may win me over. I still wouldn't buy one the first year because they couldn't even work out all the overheating issues in the C7 after all this time. But I wouldn't rule out trading in my C7 in a few years.
The C8 looks just a bit too exotic for the price in my opinion. It looks closer to a Ferrari or Lambo than a Vette, yet is a $60K with a shite ton of plastic components - that gives it a "kit car" feel to me. Anyone familiar with the "kit car" craze in the late '70s/early '80s knows what I mean. I would rather if the exotic looking car was a $100K+ offshoot (e.g., Zora) and not the next version of the Vette (C8). A car that looks like that shouldn't cost $60K - it just doesn't feel right to me.
That being said, the performance is phenomenal and frankly almost too good to be true for the price tag. It's a straight up game changer for the sports car industry and redefines expectations for all manufacturers. That alone may win me over. I still wouldn't buy one the first year because they couldn't even work out all the overheating issues in the C7 after all this time. But I wouldn't rule out trading in my C7 in a few years.
This post was edited on 10/15/19 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 10/16/19 at 3:26 am to TigrrrDad
In reading some tests the C8 has a very deep first gear and a pretty short 2nd as well to take advantage of the rear weight bias. Explains the insane 0-60 vs quarter mile time.
Tops out at 31 mph in first while the C7 would hit 51.
Tops out at 31 mph in first while the C7 would hit 51.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News