Started By
Message

re: Dems secretly change Whistle Blower law from direct knowledge to accepting heresay

Posted on 10/4/19 at 8:48 am to
Posted by LSU2ALA
Member since Jul 2018
2017 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 8:48 am to
This is simply not true. Chuck Grassley came out this week and said there has never been a requirement in the whistleblower law that you must have first hand knowledge. He has been a big advocate of whistleblower protection for a long time.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
53144 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 8:50 am to
quote:

This is simply not true. Chuck Grassley came out this week and said there has never been a requirement in the whistleblower law that you must have first hand knowledge. He has been a big advocate of whistleblower protection for a long time.


If you don't have to know what you're talking about, then the "whistleblower protection" is a farce that needs to be changed.
Posted by WorkinDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
9341 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 8:52 am to
quote:

This is simply not true. Chuck Grassley came out this week and said there has never been a requirement in the whistleblower law that you must have first hand knowledge. He has been a big advocate of whistleblower protection for a long time.




Up until it was changed right before the Ukraine mess, to file an "urgent request" you most certainly had to have 1st hand knowledge.
Posted by BACONisMEATcandy
Member since Dec 2007
46648 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 8:55 am to


Why did the IG document say this prior?
Posted by AuburnTigers
Member since Aug 2013
8647 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 8:56 am to
Grassley is on the take.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
20177 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Chuck Grassley came out this week and said there has never been a requirement in the whistleblower law that you must have first hand knowledge


In that case, I heard Nancy Pelosi has been taking money under the table from federal contractors for years, and Schiff is notorious for making unwanted sexual advances on his male Congressional pages.

I don't have to reveal my identity, and my charges must be investigated.

Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 9:14 am to
quote:

This is simply not true. Chuck Grassley came out this week and said there has never been a requirement in the whistleblower law that you must have first hand knowledge. He has been a big advocate of whistleblower protection for a long time.
Chuck Grassley is the new Jeff Sessions. I don't believe a word either of them says.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Member since Sep 2003
125486 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 9:33 am to
quote:

This is simply not true. Chuck Grassley came out this week and said there has never been a requirement in the whistleblower law that you must have first hand knowledge. He has been a big advocate of whistleblower protection for a long time.

There has never been a requirement for first hand knowledge in the whistleblower complaint.

HOWEVER . . .

There has ALWAYS been a requirement for first hand knowledge in whistleblower complaints transmitted to Congress.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram