Started By
Message

re: Is it possible the Whistleblower DID have first hand knowledge

Posted on 9/28/19 at 8:30 am to
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62723 posts
Posted on 9/28/19 at 8:30 am to
No, cause he said he didn’t. Relied on other people and news reports. This is not a Whistleblower, nothing in that report would hold up to any legal standards. He might have something right, but now you’ll have endless investigations with other people, which is the point, and endless fishing expedition for Obstruction
Posted by BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Member since May 2019
7039 posts
Posted on 9/28/19 at 8:34 am to
quote:

This is not a Whistleblower, nothing in that report would hold up to any legal standards. 


I agree with your point here. I still don't understand how all of these hearings held by Congress follow no measure of any actual legal standard. None of these things could be done in a court of law.
Court of public opinion is what they're going for.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram