- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Michael Burry calls passive investments/index funds a bubble
Posted on 9/6/19 at 8:26 pm to Louie T
Posted on 9/6/19 at 8:26 pm to Louie T
He says the small companies don't have enough outstanding stock for ALL the index funds out there. Might be true if the Vanguard Wilshire 5000, Fidelity Wilshire 5000 and Blackrock's fund bought shares in every single company. My understanding is they do not. They try to weight to each sector, and buy a few companies in each sector. And the different funds don't buy the same companies. Ie, their ownership is spread out. I think. I think I read that once.
Indexes are effective when there are enough active funds and individual owners to keep it liquid. Ie, you have a critical mass of actual people involved as well. We may not have that now; I'm not sure.
Indexes are effective when there are enough active funds and individual owners to keep it liquid. Ie, you have a critical mass of actual people involved as well. We may not have that now; I'm not sure.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)