- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I don’t care how many people you know. Nobody has 56 dead friends.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 12:12 pm to brooksbabino
Posted on 7/26/19 at 12:12 pm to brooksbabino
Then why are you so invested in responding to the post? Is your position that these people never existed, that they didn’t commit suicide or that they weren’t in Clinton circles? Being generous you could probably dismiss 30%, maybe even 50%, but that still leaves a statistical anomaly.
Your claim about who has the burden of proof doesn’t change the fact that your response was an appeal to ridicule, btw. If you want to actually refute claims of fact then it wouldn’t be that difficult. If you’re just going to say “I reject that” over and over then I’m back to my first question. It’s curious that you’d respond at all.
Your claim about who has the burden of proof doesn’t change the fact that your response was an appeal to ridicule, btw. If you want to actually refute claims of fact then it wouldn’t be that difficult. If you’re just going to say “I reject that” over and over then I’m back to my first question. It’s curious that you’d respond at all.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 12:27 pm to Flats
I'm only having a discussion. Let us boil this down to the basics. There is a claim. The claim is insinuating that the Clintons are tied to at least 56 deaths with the motive being money, power, self preservation, whatever. That's quite a claim. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to support the claim in question. So far the only evidence being offered is a 1990s chain mail which is anecdotal at best. All nit picking and ball busting aside - It is not up to ME to go down and scratch names off the list rather the burden is on the person making the claim to show why all the names on the list support the claim. It seems someone else has already scratched a few off the list so you may want to direct your attention to them.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)