Started By
Message

re: Lonzo v Moore

Posted on 7/8/19 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 12:07 pm to
If moore is playing the way he has been the past few years, plus the expiring contract he could easily be kept, played the same no of minutes as he has been, and then traded at the deadline.

Alot depends on what happens. Lets say Hart and Zo are shooting better and NAW is developing quickly, then Moore becomes expendable.

Lets say we’re not in playoff contention, then Moore becomes expendable. No reason not to let zo, Hart, and Naw develop.

But if we are contending and zo, hart, and naw are progressing slowly shooting wise, Moore will definitely be kept, whether we let his contract expire or resign him.

Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
18073 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 12:23 pm to
Bean, you're also ignoring that we brought Melli in specifically to shoot 3s when Zion is on the bench. He and Redick are the 3-pt specialists on this year's team. Redick will be out there with the 1st unit, and Melli with the 2nd.

We'll have Miller at the beginning of the season while NAW gets ready (very confident that NAW will be ready to play by the end of the season).

We don't need Moore.
Posted by JayJay2
cane sweeeeeeet tea, Luzianne
Member since Jul 2010
15359 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 12:28 pm to
You're really overrating Moore, and for your sake, I hope they keep him.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram