Started By
Message

re: Non-AD-Trade Moves in FA

Posted on 6/15/19 at 10:15 am to
Posted by TechTiger
Running an easy 10
Member since Feb 2007
1409 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 10:15 am to
Right. It would be better to hold onto Solo until the trade deadline, and attach a pick or two with him for another expiring contract.....but this time it would be for someone who can actually play. Although, if we are nowhere near a playoff team at the deadline then it might just be best to let him expire.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
15317 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 10:32 am to
If I can move Hill in the AD trade, I do it if it clears cap space for us (really the only reason I would love to send AD to LA)

Then I go after Russel or Brogdon in free agency, and still have alot of money left over to take on another contract for future pick(s)..

Washington would probably be willing to throw a 2020 top 5 protected 1st to dump Mahinmi, so a realistic deal with LA looking at the big picture could end up looking like:

LAL: AD, Hill
CHI: Ball
WAS:2025 2nd top 55 protected (because we have to send something)
NOP: Brogdon/Russel, Ingram, Hart, Carter, Mahinmi, #4, 2020 Wash 1st, 21 LA 1st

Quite the haul if you take a broader perspective relative to looking at JUST what we recieve from LA
This post was edited on 6/15/19 at 10:35 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram