- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nadler: You can't impeach president if voters won't support it
Posted on 6/2/19 at 6:20 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 6/2/19 at 6:20 pm to boosiebadazz
So our aren’t for the original intent of the framers, as you previously stated. You can go with the usc law review. I’ll go with the Supreme Court in the burr case.
1
Posted on 6/2/19 at 8:32 pm to BBONDS25
I’ve not seen anything from the Burr case that clearly defines the phrase. The case is more about treason than HCM. I think the Framers clearly thought it wider than indictable crimes, and I’ve posted many different examples of that.
Here’s the opinion: LINK
Here’s the opinion: LINK
This post was edited on 6/2/19 at 8:39 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News