- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: One important question: HAD Trump fired Rosenstein &/or Mueller, does that constitute
Posted on 5/29/19 at 1:34 pm to tigeraddict
Posted on 5/29/19 at 1:34 pm to tigeraddict
quote:
A president can't be indited.
Wasn't Bill Clinton indited? Star laid out charges.
quote:
This is to protect the institution and to keep separation of powers. can't have a state or regional fed power try to derail the office.
Well that is exactly what is happening!!
quote:
that is if there is an issue worth removing from office,
So disliking the president and then using an investigation (which may have been predicated from a frame job-we don't know yet) is "worth removing from office"? Are there no standards, meaning legality, before trying to remove a president? For example, could republicans have tried to remove Obama for subverting the constitution by implementing DACA?
quote:
congress/senate can determine the president is abusing his power/using power illegially and remove
But what does that mean? If SC was fired, how would that obstruct? Wouldn't another one be appointed? Hell, Comey's firing didn't stop FBI from investigating and a SC wasn't even needed. Am I missing something?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News