- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another math thread: "In dog beers I've only had one" doesn't make sense
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:33 pm to ReauxlTide222
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:33 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:I didn't determine the definition of the term myself. It is a very simple term that defines itself, logically. Or so I thought.
I’m not sure you get to determine the definition of the term. It is what it is, right?
quote:We are not changing it. We are trying our damnedest to explain why our definition is the only one that makes sense.
Y’all don’t get to change it.
Using "dog years" when converting human->dog AND dog->human doesn't make any sense! Take the human out of it and convert dog->cat and cat->dog. Is the 1 year old dog still 7 "dog years" old? No! He is, by definition, 1 dog year old. And in this case he's about 1 "cat year" old, too.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:39 pm to Korkstand
quote:There isn’t a term for the concept of converting the aging process of a human to a dog.
Using "dog years" when converting human->dog AND dog->human doesn't make any sense!
There’s only a term for the concept of converting the aging process of a dog to a human.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News