Started By
Message

re: Another math thread: "In dog beers I've only had one" doesn't make sense

Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:33 pm to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83862 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

People just assume the comparison is to humans, which is a good assumption probably 100% of the time. But it is still only an assumption
Oh for frick’s sake
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28746 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

quote:

People just assume the comparison is to humans, which is a good assumption probably 100% of the time. But it is still only an assumption

Oh for frick’s sake



If you're talking about a human and you say he's so many human years old, what the frick does that mean? Nothing! But if you're talking about a human and you say he's so many dog years old, now you understand that we're talking about converting the age to another animal.


So when you are talking about a dog and you say he's so many dog years old, what the frick does that mean? It only means something because you assume the comparison is to a human's lifespan. Like I said, a valid assumption, but still only an assumption. Because the term is used incorrectly.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram