- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Historical Argument for Keeping AD
Posted on 5/19/19 at 10:16 am to Crewz
Posted on 5/19/19 at 10:16 am to Crewz
The argument is that AD is a top 5 NBA player. You dont trade those away unless you have to. IF you have to you try and get the best you can out of it. But what happens is people get tunnel vision of the trade and start to believe that the best possible trade scenario is the best possible scenario overall. Its not. Having a top 5 guy is. Why else would we have teams calling us and saying "pick what you want".
If you can get him resigned, fricking do it.
If you can get him resigned, fricking do it.
1
Posted on 5/19/19 at 10:23 am to Hester Carries
quote:
If you can get him resigned, fricking do it.
Obviously. But that’s not what MM is arguing here.
He’s arguing for no opt in, no extension, just random assurances from Davis that he will vaguely “keep an open mind” and hope that he’s so impressed he will sign with us next year.
That would be completely irresponsible to the future of the franchise, just as much as not keeping AD if he wanted to extend or opt in would be.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News