- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury returns $2 billion verdict against Monsanto for couple with cancer
Posted on 5/13/19 at 8:16 pm to East Coast Band
Posted on 5/13/19 at 8:16 pm to East Coast Band
Get this---the California judge would not allow Monsanto to introduce the EPA declaration last week that glyphosate was not a carcinogen in the trial. They could only use previous EPA statements.
EPA Reaffirms Glyphosate No Danger to Public Health
EPA Reaffirms Glyphosate No Danger to Public Health
2
Posted on 5/13/19 at 9:53 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
Get this---the California judge would not allow Monsanto to introduce the EPA declaration last week that glyphosate was not a carcinogen in the trial. They could only use previous EPA statements.
And that is how judges can steer juries.
Posted on 5/13/19 at 10:35 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
Get this---the California judge would not allow Monsanto to introduce the EPA declaration last week that glyphosate was not a carcinogen in the trial. They could only use previous EPA statements.
EPA Reaffirms Glyphosate No Danger to Public Health
If I was Monsanto's lawyer, I'd risk the mistrial and the sanctions to make sure the jury knew about this.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News