Started By
Message

re: Red light cameras

Posted on 5/13/19 at 3:32 pm to
Posted by Smart Post
Member since Feb 2018
3539 posts
Posted on 5/13/19 at 3:32 pm to
Again, it has been proven that the cameras reduce the number of (deadlier) t-bone accidents.

How do you propose stopping a red-light runner from entering an intersection? Zap it with a laser or have metal spikes pop up to blow their tires? Lawsuit, lawsuit, lawsuit.

quote:

I guarantee that if an installation actually saves injuries but doesn't generate profit, then it is taken down.

In short, the cameras worked and it is no longer feasible for the taxpayer to fund a money-losing camera.

If the injuries increase again, then they can be reinstalled.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28711 posts
Posted on 5/13/19 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

How do you propose stopping a red-light runner from entering an intersection? Zap it with a laser or have metal spikes pop up to blow their tires?
I explained in an earlier post, but I'll repeat.

First and foremost you DON'T GIVE THE CROSS TRAFFIC A GREEN LIGHT. If it's clear that a vehicle can't stop in time for the red, don't let other cars drive in front of him. This is pretty simple.

Now, since we're talking about full-on T-bone collisions, this means the light-runner is extremely late (not a ticky-tacky split second runner). These are either maniacs doing it intentionally, or people not paying attention. Surely the latter case is MUCH more likely, correct? So like I said earlier, get his/her attention. Flash the red light, make it brighter, blare a train horn. Be proactive in preventing an injury. Will it be 100% effective? No, but it's a billion percent better than letting them cruise right through just to collect a fricking fine.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram