- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Being pro-choice in 2019 is the equivalent to being pro-slavery in 1860
Posted on 5/13/19 at 6:49 am to TrueTiger
Posted on 5/13/19 at 6:49 am to TrueTiger
quote:We already covered this. This is a small but noticeable meltdown by you.
So you are all in that a fetus is not property??
Look I'm totally OK with switching the fetus from the property column to the person column.
This post was edited on 5/13/19 at 6:49 am
2
Posted on 5/13/19 at 6:56 am to xiv
The kid is one or the other, person or property.
Those are the legal choices.
Those are the legal choices.
Posted on 5/13/19 at 9:14 am to xiv
quote:
We already covered this. This is a small but noticeable meltdown by you.
In the law, there are two columns. Person and property. Your ignorance of that fact doesn’t change it. If the argument is that a fetus is not a person...it is then property.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News