Started By
Message

re: Renovating the Superdome vs building a new bridge in Baton Rouge

Posted on 5/11/19 at 10:07 am to
Posted by Lickitty Split
Inside
Member since Apr 2017
3917 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 10:07 am to
I actually believe the bridge would generate local business, alleviate some of the stresses on local business, encourage more commerce between south Louisiana cities and towns and bring a physical embodiment of the people’s will for the state to improve through one landmark.

Maybe I’m too egalitarian but this doesn’t pass the smell test.

ETA: Fap Sam, I said the $210 because I knew about what the Stadium and Exposition District was paying. I didn’t know the state was on the hook for the remaining $90 million. If you add the $90 that the “state” is claimed to pay then you get $300 milllion.
This post was edited on 5/11/19 at 10:12 am
Posted by FAP SAM
Member since Sep 2014
2897 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 10:35 am to
LSED (the government entity which oversees the property) =/= "the state"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram