Started By
Message

re: Was the Starbucks cup actually a product placement?

Posted on 5/10/19 at 2:15 pm to
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56778 posts
Posted on 5/10/19 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

If an advertisement, they would not use a generic or non-Starbucks labeled cup
They would because the logo would be too distracting. It's enough that the buzz afterwards is about Starbucks.

Notice they haven't been relentlessly correcting people who say it's Starbucks. Plus, isn't this the second time they've done this?

The real question is: who owns that little Irish coffee place? Eh? If the owner is listed as "Rachel Benoiff" or "Lilian Weiss," I'm calling Jump Street.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36204 posts
Posted on 5/10/19 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

If an advertisement, they would not use a generic or non-Starbucks labeled cup
quote:

They would because the logo would be too distracting.

Now you're just fricking with us.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram