- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Uber and Lyft Drivers Are Striking Today
Posted on 5/8/19 at 1:32 pm to Kujo
Posted on 5/8/19 at 1:32 pm to Kujo
quote:
You are missing the point. its not about what you want and how it's better for you, it's about a level playing field. My objection is why were they allowed to bypass laws.
It's like only allowing 50 restaurant permits at a fee of 10M per permit in a city. then turning around and allowing limitless food trucks with no permit fee.
You can't really hate the restaurants for long wait times because 10k people want to goto 50 restaurants, and it's not really fair either to claim that food trucks were innovative when the city was shutting down lemonade stands, girl scout cookie tables, and church bake sales as "food establishments" ...but then all of a sudden decide that food trucks are mobile and dont fall under the definition of "establishment".
No, you're missing your own point.
Every "problem" you're describing is a result of the government interfering in the free market. And your proposed solution is to have the government interfere more in the free market.
C'mon man.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:40 pm to CptRusty
quote:
No, you're missing your own point.
Every "problem" you're describing is a result of the government interfering in the free market. And your proposed solution is to have the government interfere more in the free market.
C'mon man.
Yes, we should end all medicare, food stamps, section 8, SS, etc. because they aren't sustainable, hard to regulate, people would be better off investing themselves, yada, yada, yada.
I agree with you, but you can't change the game midstream and put people on the streets without a transition plan. That's what happened here. The gov created a situation, people complied, then they willingly allowed a group to circumvent established laws while not allowing the "overly regulated" group the ability to counter.
That's what is missed. Sure end all regs free market, strip clubs where they weren't allowed before, serve alcohol to minors, whatever the "public wants". But compensate me for the liquor license that you charged me for, allow me to also serve minors and not just app based bars, and establish a transition plan....i.e. by 2025 minors can order drinks at bars with an app because law states that minors cant order, but doesn't specifically say that an app can't.
If they in 2010, established that there's no limit on the number of taxis by 2015. Taxi companies would have brought in 1,000s of more vehicles and had drivers ready for the new rules. The ride share apps wouldn't have had a shot.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)