- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: James Woods with the boom
Posted on 5/6/19 at 9:36 am to SDVTiger
Posted on 5/6/19 at 9:36 am to SDVTiger
quote:
What a fraud you are
Yep....oh, and
quote:
From the perspective of a supporter of abortion rights (“early-term fetus is not a person”), it is a complete non-sequitur and thus a bit silly.
Given that we just saw pro abortion folks chanting over a "graveyard" of aborted babies "Stop hey, what's that sound, aborted fetus' in the ground"...........
Look though. ANOTHER Hank post trying to steer a thread.
Unheard of!
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Posted on 5/6/19 at 9:42 am to ShortyRob
quote:Shorty, cover up. Your obsession is showing.
Look though. ANOTHER Hank post trying to steer a thread.
OP posted a Woods tweet, implying that it was particularly noteworthy. By doing so, he implicitly elicited comment on that tweet.
I commented that those who ALEADY agree with Woods would see it as a “boom,” and that those who ALREADY disagree would see it as a silly non-sequitur.
I fail to see how that comment constitutes some nefarious effort to “steer” the thread ... unless one simply opposes competing views as a matter of principle.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)