Started By
Message

re: EPA- today Glyphosate (Roundup), Reaffirms No Risk to Public Health

Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:49 pm to
Posted by rowbear1922
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2008
15369 posts
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

Was it due to his excessive use of Round up? You tell me, Mr expert


You are using anecdotal evidence.

You tell me how you know it’s round up? Cancer is a fricking bitch and I wouldn’t wish it on anyone but you have no Proof it was because of round up.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
63980 posts
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

You tell me how you know it’s round up? Cancer is a fricking bitch and I wouldn’t wish it on anyone but you have no Proof it was because of round up.

I don't have proof, but it's certainly a coincidence that a chemical that SOME feel it causes cancer and I know someone first hand who handled excessive amounts of it also died of cancer, I feel OK in saying that the RoundUp just might be the case. He didn't drink or smoke, so you can rule that out.
I think I have a stronger case of that it could have been due to Roundup, citing examples used in the class action suit against Monsanto, than you can tell me his cancer was NOT a cause of it.
Look, I'm not one to always say that a certain chemical will always cause something or other, I'm really just saying that I wouldn't just feel honky dory about something, just because the EPA says it is no risk. I'm sorry, but there is just too much money to be thrown around by these chemical companies and they don't want their prized product to be labeled a carcinogen.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram