Started By
Message

re: Half of the UK is owned by 1%

Posted on 4/20/19 at 12:14 pm to
Posted by Decisions
Member since Mar 2015
1493 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 12:14 pm to
I looked at that study and don’t necessarily agree with you. According to the graphs the families that were rich regressed pretty significantly back to the mean over the course of 3-4 generations. Certainly far enough to not be considered “rich” anymore.

When I say “fortunes are lost” I’m not saying the descendants spend themselves into the depths of poverty. I’m picturing a fall from wealthy to something like middle/upper-middle class. I know that doesn’t seem as drastic as some would like to picture, but it’s the most common outcome.

Children decide that they’re content with the portion that they’re given and rather than adding to the estate they stagnate. Then it’s split amongst their heirs during the next generation and the problem snowballs further.

THIS outcome is all too common. Some families avoided this pitfall somewhat through primogeniture, but it really comes down to inherited ambition, not inherited assets.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19584 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 2:52 pm to
Again, you’re just talking about churn. There will be fluctuations, but those rich families are staying rich.

The richest families in Florence in 1427, are the richest families in Florence today.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram