Started By
Message

re: These games suck. Too many low scoring games

Posted on 3/25/19 at 8:33 am to
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25902 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Good D, or just bad O and slower O?


1) Obviously the O is worse than the NBA. The NBA is full of NBA players. Relatively few players on even the best college teams will ever play extended time on an NBA roster.

2) The O is slower because to create good shots with worse players, you need to run offensive sets, move the ball side to side, get guys set up in good position on the block, etc. That all takes time. This is made more difficult without the spacing provided by the NBA 3-point line (and NBA 3-point shooters).

Then, you have to score on defenses like UVA, TTU, Duke, etc. who are busting their arse every possession with big-time athletes.

Taking your time is smart for most teams.
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 8:34 am
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85489 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Taking your time is smart for most teams.



I completely agree. When you're less talented, you want fewer possessions to increase the volatility of each possession.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram