Started By
Message

Mary Queen of Scots

Posted on 3/24/19 at 12:50 am
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42263 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 12:50 am
The wife and I both watched it together with our Son who was home from college tonight.

We’re both well over 60% Scots Irish and we’ve traveled extensively over there, explored a ton of the country’s history .... I’m an avid history buff on the region as is my Son-in-Law who teaches college level history as is my niece who teaches college level history .... we all revel in Scottish and Irish and English history.

This movie was touted as historically correct with a small play on certain aspects for artistic reasons.

Movie was total shite. It was so out of order, so made up, so absolutely false it was heinous. And forget the many many historical inaccuracies.

Why the gratuitous black man white woman relationship which almost certainly didn’t happen .... and why the gratuitous LBGT storyline in an effort to paint another hateful picture of white European lords against the poor gay men? I could give a shite about either in the modern world .... but it was totally unnecessary in the telling of this story.

WTF?

Will the Hollywood bullshite ever end.

Just say the movie is for entertainment purposes only and don’t try to pawn it off as historically accurate.

Just say it’s a bunch of made up bulllshit based very very loosely on actual events and that a lot of creative license was taken in the script and the making of the movie.

One of the worst movies ever IMHO. Every Scot, every Irishman, every Englishman should be offended by that shite show of a film as should all descendants of those cultures.

The occasional narration from actual letters exchanged between Mary and Elizabeth was pure smoke and mirrors to deceive and mislead. The overplayed modern day SJW nonsense inserted into the story was just as bad if not worse.

Anyways ... the movie accomplished nothing in terms of art OR historical story telling IMHO.

ETA: There wasn’t even a Shakespearean quality to the story telling ... and we all know Shakespeare could tell a good story but was full of shite. At least he made his revisionist history entertaining and engaging.

MovieRantReviewOff/
This post was edited on 3/24/19 at 12:54 am
Posted by DragginFly
Under the Mountain;By the Lake
Member since Oct 2014
3686 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:03 am to
So, in a nutshell, how would you rate it?
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
106326 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:08 am to


In all honesty, I’m trying to remember the last time I saw a largely accurate historical movie. Not that I don’t disagree with the premise that the saga in question was plenty juicy enough that it’d be good story telling if it was told accurately. I just don’t think it’s remotely some new liberal thing.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:12 am to
Not a movie that I would ever consider watching.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
73255 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:51 am to
If your Scottish never watch Braveheart.


Posted by LouisianaLonghorn
Austin, Texas
Member since Jan 2006
15699 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Why the gratuitous black man white woman relationship which almost certainly didn’t happen .... and why the gratuitous LBGT storyline in an effort to paint another hateful picture of white European lords against the poor gay men? I could give a shite about either in the modern world .... but it was totally unnecessary in the telling of this story.


Historical accuracy is out the window in favor of diversity casting. Get used to it. It's all the rage in Hollywood these days. I love Gemma Chan. She's beautiful and a very good actress, but I'm pretty sure that Bess Hardwick wasn't Asian. Having a black man on Elizabeth's privy council was even more ridiculous. As far as the LGBT plot line, I've seen at least one other film about Mary where Darnley was depicted as being gay. I have no idea if there is any historical basis for this, or it was just creative license on the part of the writers.

One glaring inaccuracy in this film was having Mary speak with a Scottish brogue. As she spent all of her formative years in the French court, she would've undoubtedly had a French accent. I'm not sure if Mary and Elizabeth ever exchanged letters as shown, but there is no historical basis in fact to confirm that they ever met in person, despite this being a pivotal scene in this film as well as in other versions of Mary's story.
Posted by H. E. Pennypacker
Louisiana IceGators Fan
Member since Mar 2013
918 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 9:45 am to
Tiger droppings user complaining about gays and/or black people in movies...

Boy, now I’ve seen it all.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69888 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 11:54 am to
quote:

In all honesty, I’m trying to remember the last time I saw a largely accurate historical movie.


While it wasn't well-received by critics, Outlaw King starring Chris Pine was a movie released very recently that was praised for its historical accuracy.

Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 12:05 pm to
How did the movie treat Knox?
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
39037 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 12:13 pm to
quote:


We’re both well over 60% Scots Irish


Then you'll love this...

Fast-paced exciting documentary...that is so in-depth, you have to watch it about 5 times.



Cue the subtitles.
Posted by lsunurse
Member since Dec 2005
129146 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 1:31 pm to
This guy is way too upset over a movie.


Old man rant if I ever saw one.

(Remember this is the same guy that got waaayyyy upset that Claire in Outlander was upset she saw slaves up close )
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42263 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 9:43 pm to
Wow some great perspective and insight into my thoughts .... thanks guys.

I’ll check out the documentary I guarantee it.

And yes, I agree with the whole Hollywood mantra/ talking points these days ... it’s inescapable unfortunately.

Agree also about the recent Netflix film about Robert the Bruce. They went all out to tell that story and present those sets as historically accurate as possible and I thought Chris Pine did a good job.

Most historically correct movie ever? I dunno .... I’d probably have to say Band of Brothers but it really doesn’t classify as a movie. Still, I met a lot of those guys at the Airborne Convention in Houston in ‘82 I think it was and they said the books were spot on.

They were younger than I am now at the time - when I met so many of them.

I actually like Cate Blancett’s version of Elizabeth much better... even though it was pro English and I’m not a big fan of the English.

Besides ... Fanny Ardant played Mary in that version and she was one of the most beautiful women in the world in her day. And listen, they cast her as Mary because she is French which supports that contention in a post above.

Yeah yeah yeah .... I know the rules.






:cheers: :cheers: :cheers: :cheers: :cheers:
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
83236 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 10:58 pm to
I understand what you’re saying. I’m a history fan, as is my father. He’s still not happy about Gladiator and fussed about it every time it comes on. Most movies, like Gladiator, don’t advertise themselves as being historically accurate. If this movie did claim to be accurate and still wasn’t, then I agree with your critique. The forced diversity and whatnot is just a fact of modern movies now. Personally, i didn’t like seeing Christian Bale play Moses, just as i don’t need to see a black guy on the Privy Council.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

Tiger droppings user complaining about gays and/or black people in movies...

Boy, now I’ve seen it all.




Heaven forbid somebody expresses a God damned opinion on a board for expressing God damned opinions about movies.

Of course the movie wasn't accurate - nobody back then looked like Margot Robbie
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
73255 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 9:11 am to
Even it had some flaws.
It was good though.
Posted by LouisianaLonghorn
Austin, Texas
Member since Jan 2006
15699 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Besides ... Fanny Ardant played Mary in that version and she was one of the most beautiful women in the world in her day. And listen, they cast her as Mary because she is French which supports that contention in a post above.


Didn't Fanny play Mary of Guise? She was the mother of Mary, Queen of Scots.

Samantha Morton played Mary QOS in the sequel to Elizabeth.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42263 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 12:00 am to
Oooooops .... thanks for the reminder. You’re correct.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69888 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 1:15 am to
Still my favorite Mary Queen of Scots:

Posted by LouisianaLonghorn
Austin, Texas
Member since Jan 2006
15699 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Still my favorite Mary Queen of Scots:


She was beautiful, but that series played fast and loose with historical facts. I thought that Catherine was the best part of the show.
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
10535 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 8:42 am to
My ex wife is a direct descendant of that count.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram