Started By
Message

re: the Bench Tweet just now

Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:16 pm to
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
280934 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

if his actions aren't viewed as unreasonable or if the breach isn't viewed as material.



I think it is pretty obvious that his actions have been unreasonable. I didn’t realize that had to be explained.

You couple in the first leak where he lied to LSU about any of involvement & they 100% have grounds to fire him based on his conduct and inability to show up for a sit down as requested. I don’t even have to be a lawyer to know that
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
45300 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:25 pm to
He didn’t deny any involvement you arse hat.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65993 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

I think it is pretty obvious that his actions have been unreasonable

How do you figure?
quote:

I didn’t realize that had to be explained

Sure you did. It will always have to be explained and proven for those provisions to be enforceable. I didn't realize that had to be explained
quote:

You couple in the first leak where he lied to LSU about any of involvement & they 100% have grounds to fire him based on his conduct and inability to show up for a sit down as requested.

quite a leap you've taken here with what we actually know right now
quote:

I don’t even have to be a lawyer to know that

The maybe shut your mouth and don't try to act like one. You're out of your league bud
This post was edited on 3/19/19 at 2:41 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram