re: With all the leaks how can anyone not see wade as vindicated on not talking?

quote:

---

While he is under subpoena, based on the information released to date, Wade will not be testifying in the April trial. Nothing about the two conversations is relevant to the case against these defendants. Just because a party has him subpoenaed does not mean the judge is going to allow him to testify, his testimony has to be relevant before it will be allowed.

These defendants are accused of bribing coaches at Oklahoma State, Kansas, TCU, Creighton and NC State. Dawkins phone calls with Wade had nothing to do with this.

The reason the Dawkins' defense team is leaking this information is because none of it going to be allowed at trial and they are trying to tell a narrative of "everybody does it" (so its voluntary and not a bribe) through the media.

---

Agree with all of this and have been saying it on here since the leaks started. Defense counsel was shut down trying to introduce this same information in the first trial. They want this information to be known, so if they are doubting their ability to be able do so at trial, may as well violate a protective order and start leaking this information to the media. They've made everyone well aware of their intentions to try to expose everything for quite some time. Dawkins already knows he's screwed, so he's going for broke and trying to take everyone down with him.