- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: National debt tops $22 trillion for the first time as experts warn of ripple effects
Posted on 2/13/19 at 4:17 pm to Taxing Authority
Posted on 2/13/19 at 4:17 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
So yes... let’s blame republicans for what they hypothetical might have done instead of Obama for what he actually did. Makes perfect sense.
Dude shortyrob just went on a rant about how republicans hypothetically spend less than democrats do. You guys say all the time that they do (even when they don't). Hence this line.
quote:
You do realize the ARRA included huge payroll tax cuts right?
Yes, hence the use of the word more to indicate more of something that already was in the bill
quote:
Of course not. You’ve made up a hypothetical in your head. That’s kinda like evidence, eh?
Once again, I didn't bring up fricking hypotheticals. I am giving you my opinion because you guys have given me yours. I asked shortyrob to produce evidence of republicans controlling spending and you know what he gave me? Hypotheticals.
quote:
Oddly no one does this for Reagan, who arguably had a worse economic situation that had been lagging far longer. Nor do you do it for Bush43 who had a recession in 2001-2003. You’re exposed as f*ck.
You're comparing 2008 to Reagan and GHWB's admins. Wow.
quote:
So increase of 5% with declining deficits, and a growing economy. And you’re accusing others of not viewing thing in economic contests? k.
The deficit did not decline between 2005 and 2006. You are mistaken.
This post was edited on 2/13/19 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 2/13/19 at 4:30 pm to cahoots
quote:1/ whataboutism at its finest. 2/ you’re substituting a hypothetical for reality.
Dude shortyrob just went on a rant about how republicans hypothetically spend less than democrats do
quote:No one typed your words for you as AFAIK. ShortyRob didn’t make you do that.
Once again, I didn't bring up fricking hypotheticals.
quote:Yeah. I am. You should have a look at employment patterns, fiscal policy, and the effects of outside borrowers. The US was GREATLY aided in 2008-2010 by the rest of the world flight to safety of the US Treasury. Your illiteracy is hampering you.
You're comparing 2008 to Reagan and GHWB's admins. Wow.
quote:It most certainly did.
The deficit did not decline between 2005 and 2006. You are mistaken.
Deficits
2004 -$412B
2005 -$318B
2006 -$248B
2007 -$160B
This post was edited on 2/13/19 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 2/13/19 at 5:05 pm to cahoots
quote:
I asked shortyrob to produce evidence of republicans controlling spending and you know what he gave me? Hypotheticals
Well this is just false.
I said a majority of democrats favor several massive expansions on spending. That's not even debatable.
But I never said that Republicans are good at controlling spending. I said that at least there are some repeat some repeat some since you're stupid as frick repeats some Republicans who are actually for reducing spending but there are zero Democrats
and I pointed out that at the least the Republicans aren't favoring massive new entitlement programs and massive new discretionary spending. Also both undisputedly true
You might want to try again
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News