- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Former abortion doctor says: ‘You Never Need Late-Term Abortion To Save A Woman’s Life’
Posted on 2/11/19 at 4:14 pm to GRTiger
Posted on 2/11/19 at 4:14 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I'd ask them the same question that you won't answer. What is the point in doing two procedures (abortion, delivery) when one procedure (delivery) achieves the same thing?
Your OB tells you that your child has a condition where they have no brain or no kidneys. That child is delivered and will suffer for hours or days and will die because they have a non-viable condition.
You also have the option to have an abortion where a doctor injects potassium chloride into the heart of the fetus, eliminating the child's suffering, for a non-viable fetus.
So, do you think the government should determine how to care for your non-viable child?
Do you think the government should force parents to keep their children alive with extraordinary measures?
3
Posted on 2/11/19 at 4:15 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
our OB tells you that your child has a condition where they have no brain or no kidneys. That child is delivered and will suffer for hours or days and will die because they have a non-viable condition.
How does one without a brain suffer?
Posted on 2/11/19 at 4:17 pm to mahdragonz
I encourage you to take advantage of abortions whenever possible.
Please don't procreate.
Please don't procreate.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 4:27 pm to mahdragonz
I'd be less inclined to believe these dem politicians are monsters if these laws clearly made viability the sole exception. They don't, so your deflection is no good here.
Also, I don't think anyone is advocating the government force the delivery of a functionally dead fetus. So to restate, your defective straw man is no good here.
Lastly, many if not most of those issues are identified well before the 3rd trimester, and before general viability. In case your ability to identify context is off today, that doesn't really apply here.
Now answer this. Your wife is 32 weeks pregnant. Her life is suddenly at risk and the pregnancy needs to end. The doctor informs you that he could save her life and deliver a perfectly healthy baby. Are you suggesting the government should not be able to step in and say "no way you can kill that baby?"
Also, I don't think anyone is advocating the government force the delivery of a functionally dead fetus. So to restate, your defective straw man is no good here.
Lastly, many if not most of those issues are identified well before the 3rd trimester, and before general viability. In case your ability to identify context is off today, that doesn't really apply here.
Now answer this. Your wife is 32 weeks pregnant. Her life is suddenly at risk and the pregnancy needs to end. The doctor informs you that he could save her life and deliver a perfectly healthy baby. Are you suggesting the government should not be able to step in and say "no way you can kill that baby?"
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News