- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: B & C ruined deer and hunting camps
Posted on 1/11/19 at 8:07 am to mylsuhat
Posted on 1/11/19 at 8:07 am to mylsuhat
I'm just playing devils advocate
let's say you have the current herd on say Giles Island
would venture to say it's a healthy herd, probably enough food to support the herd, with a all age classes represented
let's say you let loose a group of coonasses or rednecks on that place for two years and they take out half the population (all age classes)
now you have fewer deer on the same amount of property which allows those remaining deer more access to the food so those will get bigger (more "healthy") all age classes are still represented well
I would say the latter population is more healthy because they have an abundance of food due to less competition for resources
tl,dr
a healthy herd has to do with carrying capacity not size of antlers
let's say you have the current herd on say Giles Island
would venture to say it's a healthy herd, probably enough food to support the herd, with a all age classes represented
let's say you let loose a group of coonasses or rednecks on that place for two years and they take out half the population (all age classes)
now you have fewer deer on the same amount of property which allows those remaining deer more access to the food so those will get bigger (more "healthy") all age classes are still represented well
I would say the latter population is more healthy because they have an abundance of food due to less competition for resources
tl,dr
a healthy herd has to do with carrying capacity not size of antlers
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 8:09 am
Posted on 1/11/19 at 8:16 am to Ron Cheramie
I agree with your premise but I would also say that deer can only eat a finite amount of food so if you have enough food to feed 500 deer but have 450 on your place then you're in great shape. If you knock that down to 75 deer, you still have an abundance of food but less deer.
There really is no right answer outside of not having more deer than food available
There really is no right answer outside of not having more deer than food available
Posted on 1/11/19 at 9:13 am to Ron Cheramie
If
So this,
is a fairy tail.
quote:then this
let's say you let loose a group of coonasses or rednecks on that place for two years
quote:will never happen.
they take out half the population (all age classes)
So this,
quote:
now you have fewer deer on the same amount of property which allows those remaining deer more access to the food so those will get bigger (more "healthy") all age classes are still represented well
is a fairy tail.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News