quote:
So we need to adopt a tax system that eliminates an incompetent IRS. Finally. Some agreement.

So we can’t trust experienced tax enforcement at the IRS and cannot trust the SC to prove what you allude to. So we give the documents over to Adam Schiff for a competent resolution? Are you listening to yourself?

No, you give it to the public, dude. It's a requirement for public release of financial information.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Lg

Hayden, Alabama

Member since Jul 2011

6907 posts

Posted on 1/9/19 at 1:56 pm to TigerDoc

quote:
No, you give it to the public, dude. It's a requirement for public release of financial information.

How many people in the general population, who aren't CPA's, would be able to understand that kind of tax return?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by CleverUserName

Member since Oct 2016

12929 posts

Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:15 pm to TigerDoc

quote:
No, you give it to the public, dude. It's a requirement for public release of financial information

Well it’s obviously not. That congressional fund used to pay of sexual assault victims appears to not be very important in this era of #metoo.

And if the president’s is so important.... why isn’t the Speaker of the House’s returns not important? How do we know she isn’t being influenced to oppose trump since he is altering trade deals? She is rich. Did her family acquire all of that with zero foreign ties?

Goose-Gander. Include Congress and the SC justices and all taxpayer provided perks and funds or no deal. It sounds like you would be in full agreement to demand this be included by your concerns and assertions

And furthermore... the SC report will be public.. right?

This post was edited on 1/9/19 at 2:25 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board