- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: No retribution against 91?
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:47 pm to Southcoast
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:47 pm to Southcoast
It was a legal block!! That’s football
2
Posted on 1/1/19 at 7:51 pm to Bandits58
quote:
It was a legal block!! That’s football
It wasn't based on the rule. Head and neck area...if you replay it you will see that. Burrow didn't just get a cut on his face because it wasn't in the head or neck area.
But as for the topic, winning is the ultimate retribution. I would have liked to someone bulldoze #91, but I will take the W.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 8:14 pm to Bandits58
Peel back blocks haven't been legal for a while now you dumbass.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News