Started By
Message

re: Can someone please explain the recent Obamacare ruling?

Posted on 12/16/18 at 10:16 am to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 12/16/18 at 10:16 am to
SCOTUS ruled that Obamacare was constitutional with the individual mandate attached because it was seen by the Roberts Court as a tax. The individual mandate was removed from the law by Congress within the last year. As a result, the federal judge in Texas ruled the entire law unconstitutional because the tax (individual mandate) was no longer part of the law.

This ruling will eventually have to be heard again by the Supreme Court.


This post was edited on 12/16/18 at 10:17 am
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68953 posts
Posted on 12/16/18 at 10:25 am to
Yes,

The original 2012 ruling conditioned the constitutionality of the ACA on it being a tax.

In 2017 Congress took away the tax.

Therefore, the condition the ACA's constitutionality depended on is now gone.
This post was edited on 12/16/18 at 10:27 am
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
6962 posts
Posted on 12/16/18 at 11:06 am to
The mandate was not removed.

The penalty for not paying the mandate was reduced but the mandate still exists.

Even though no costs are being created, the tax still exists.

Just accept that obamacare will never go away and that the republicans are the major reason why.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram