quote:
It was a private transaction used with money that never touched campaign. I think you’re right about being able to prove extortion and payoffs have happened before Trump ever ran for Prez.

The keys in the case are the fact that Cohen and AMI (it will have been Pecker who spoke to the Grand Jury and his deputy was given immunity I believe - probably eventually Weisselberg the CFO of Trump org too, btw) testified to the fact that the payoffs had the purpose to influence the outcome of the campaign, as well as the timeline of events - both sexual encounters/affairs happened in 2006 and Trump only saw fit to pay them off just weeks before the election.

This post was edited on 12/13/18 at 8:56 am

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by SDVTiger

Cabo San Lucas

Member since Nov 2011

75178 posts

Posted on 12/13/18 at 8:53 am to TigerDoc

quote:
both sexual encounters/affairs happened in 2016 and Trump only saw fit to pay them off just weeks before the election.

Oh noz he must be indicted then. Dude you have been so wrong about everything it's amazing.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Jbird

In Bidenville with EthanL

Member since Oct 2012

73558 posts

Posted on 12/13/18 at 8:59 am to TigerDoc

Sounds like a certain Reverend in the recent past.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by TOKEN

Member since Feb 2014

11990 posts

Posted on 12/13/18 at 9:10 am to TigerDoc

quote:
the fact that the payoffs had the purpose to influence the outcome of the campaign, as well as the timeline of events - both sexual encounters/affairs happened in 2006 and Trump only saw fit to pay them off just weeks before the election

Good point, but I still contend you can dirty the intent side of this by stating this was to protect Melania from finding out. He can say the extortion happens prior to election.

1 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board