quote:
For example: Christianity is radical, illogical and unscientific. I'm a Christian but I have no problem admitting that. The very nature of Christianity is that it requires faith and radicalism because it's so illogical (i.e. people can't raise from the dead and ascend into the sky).

Let me try to reframe it. Do you feel like you are objective when it comes to specific beliefs? As in Jesus as the son of God (just an example)?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Pecker

Rocky Top

Member since May 2015

16674 posts

Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:53 pm to northshorebamaman

quote:
Let me try to reframe it. Do you feel like you are objective when it comes to specific beliefs? As in Jesus as the son of God (just an example)?

Within the framework of my beliefs. Also in that I can admit where there are logical inconsistencies. It's a difficult question because anything that requires faith isn't objective at its core. But you can be as impartial as possible within a particular framework.

Not sure if that answers your question

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by arcalades

USA

Member since Feb 2014

19276 posts

Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:09 pm to northshorebamaman

quote:
Do you feel like you are objective when it comes to specific beliefs? As in Jesus as the son of God (just an example)?

Yes. I objectively looked at what the various beliefs claim, and Christ is the most logical and safest pick. Christ is the only only one who acknowledges that sin is the problem, it separates us from our Creator, and he offers a solution to sin. No other belief/religion does so.

The most amazing part of all this is how billions of people refuse to actually learn the specifics of Christianity yet dismiss it completely. Science is not logical. There is nothing objectively logical about believing in evolution. It is soundly retarded.

3 ...

Report Post

O-T Lounge - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board