Started By
Message

re: Collaboration to save the West's forests

Posted on 12/8/18 at 10:56 am to
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35178 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Your country boy must not live out west. Clear cutting solves the fire issue for a long time. Out west grass fires are not nearly the concern as forest fires. When you see a 80 foot tall lodge pole pine explode (not burn - freaking explode) you will understand. After clear cutting there would need to be weed management practices, but that process in a limited fashion is great for forests and wildlife.


In your opinion, MI, do thos 80's "explode" because their dense proximity allows off the chart combustion in a 70mph wind? Could they be thinned, and the understory controlled-burned in proper times, so that big trees could be allowed with minimal risks? I love big trees; have hugged a bunch. I don't care if they can't love me back. Hell, Jesus didn't care that those who nailed him up, didn't love him back.

I just know there is common sense middle ground to manage those wildfires. Extremes - in any case other than 'extreme' Truth - have to come together. It's not an asteroid or super-volcano.

Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18848 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 10:07 am to
Its likely a little of both. I am not in favor of what you think Clear Cutting is. Clear Cutting is confined to certain areas not the whole mountain side.

Selective logging would work as well, the benefit to clear cutting is new meadows for the critters like elk which nothing beat glassing the edge of a meadow and seeing a big bull in the fall...

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram