- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does anyone still think Orgeron was a better hire than Herman?
Posted on 12/1/18 at 2:10 pm to roscoe mike
Posted on 12/1/18 at 2:10 pm to roscoe mike
Herman is 1000000X the better coach
2
Posted on 12/1/18 at 2:18 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
Herman is 1000000X the better coach
That was made so obvious when he almost got as many yards and points as Matt Canada in the Texas loss to Maryland.
Maryland had a huge and obvious advantage though. They had a player who died and an interim head coach. Any Rantard can tell you that it is very difficult to beat an interim head coach.
That is the only reason Eaux was successful turning around unranked USC and LSU. They both finished nationally ranked and in bowl games after not being ranked when he took over.
Posted on 12/1/18 at 2:25 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
Herman is 1000000X the better coach
Hotlips as also at a huge disadvantage on talent. Everyone knows that Maryland, Oklahoma State and West Virginia has a huge advantage in talent over Texas. All of those teams are ranked in the top 5 every year in recruiting when not finishing #1.
It's hilarious to consider that Texas could have as much talent as Maryland. That is the ONLY reason Texas lost to them twice in two seasons. Maryland is loaded and had an interim coach. Who on Earth could overcome that?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News