- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 247 has an article about the refs and bad calls
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:53 am to Prominentwon
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:53 am to Prominentwon
Can someone explain why the incompletion wasn't challenged? Out of everything, that was the most egregious. Clearly a catch, fumble, game over.
Was that on O to challenge?
Was that on O to challenge?
2
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:40 am to CQQ
I agree with this, admittingly not a rules expert but the player caught it, secured it and took two strides before fumbling, I mean damn.
Can someone explain why the incompletion wasn't challenged? Out of everything, that was the most egregious. Clearly a catch, fumble, game over.
Was that on O to challenge?
Can someone explain why the incompletion wasn't challenged? Out of everything, that was the most egregious. Clearly a catch, fumble, game over.
Was that on O to challenge?
Posted on 11/25/18 at 10:40 am to CQQ
quote:
Can someone explain why the incompletion wasn't challenged? Out of everything, that was the most egregious. Clearly a catch, fumble, game over. Was that on O to challenge?
It seems to me that the replay official in Birmingham should have called a halt to play to review it. After all, he bent over backwards to halt play to review the play where Delpit made the INT. The fumble ruled incomplete deserved to be reviewed just as much as the play where Mond's knee was ruled down after review.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News