re: What Is There To “Win” For Progs In The Acosta Case?

quote:

---

Some people enjoy the free press afforded by the First Amendment. Some people (including the SCOTUS per Sherrill v Knight) see the WH's removal of press credentials as stifling that freedom of the press and free speech.

---

One more time for the stupid , no one removed any "press pass"

idiots, his permanent security pass for the WH was revoked. Completely within the Secret Service's discretion to do so

If you were not such a dumb frick you would realize that the case you cited does NOT mean the Secret Service can not at THEIR discretion deny a security pass to whomever they decide, it simply says that they must tell the person who was denied, why they were denied, which the SS did not do in the case of Sherill.

The case you cited actually acknowledges that the Secret Service has sole dominion over White House security passes, it simply allows that those denied a pass have a right to know why they were denied a pass.

Moron