Started By
Message

re: Coach 0 should NOT get an extension

Posted on 11/6/18 at 8:04 am to
Posted by El Magnifico
La casa de tu mamá
Member since Jan 2014
7017 posts
Posted on 11/6/18 at 8:04 am to
The reason he would get an extension is for recruiting purposes. If O were to be a lame duck going into next year the negative recruiting would kill us. Think people, an extension does not mean larger buyout or that we can't fire him anyway.
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
28078 posts
Posted on 11/6/18 at 8:26 am to
quote:

If O were to be a lame duck going into next year the negative recruiting would kill us. Think people, an extension does not mean larger buyout or that we can't fire him anyway.

He wouldn’t be a lame duck, he has three more seasons after this one. And yes, the buyout will increase since they’re tied to the number of years on the contract. Maybe the yearly rate won’t increase, but the aggregate will increase with any additional years added.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:08 am to
quote:

The reason he would get an extension is for recruiting purposes. If O were to be a lame duck going into next year the negative recruiting would kill us. Think people, an extension does not mean larger buyout or that we can't fire him anyway.


Les Miles was all but fired in 2015 and he finished with the #2 class.
Posted by nola000
Lacombe, LA
Member since Dec 2014
13139 posts
Posted on 11/6/18 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Think people, an extension does not mean larger buyout or that we can't fire him anyway.


This.

The extension is irrelevant if the buyout is manageable. They could give him a 1,000 year extension and it wouldn't matter if his buyout is $0
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram