re: Serious question for all the "it's Emsminger/scheme" people

- Failed to score a single point in Ensminger's two opportunities against Bama. Ensminger literally has the worst resume in college football, as an OC. The offense exhibited zero creativity and exposed the team's deficiencies, rather than hiding them.
- Play Action does not work, if you have had zero success in the rush game. The play action wastes time that the QB could be surveying the field. LSU needed to spread the field with 4 or 5 wides and throw the ball in under 3 seconds. Ensminger's scheme passes only on obvious passing downs, utilizes slow developing pass plays, utilizes zero creativity/ misdirection, and requires Burrow to make decisions that he obviously is not comfortable making.
- I would spread the field as wide as possible and utilize a snap/throw philosophy. No drop backs and get the ball out before anyone could get to the QB. Fast tempo would wear the defense down and setup more opportunities down field. I would utilize creativity and sprinkle in the option with Clyde at QB and Brosette at RB. I sure wouldn't just give up because we were less talented.

Ultimately Purdue beat Ohio State because of scheme, as they were not near as talented. Regardless of what I would call in the game, I guarantee that I could score at least "0" points.