- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Some non-Anti-O-Nega from a guy everyone knows is Nega when it comes to O
Posted on 11/4/18 at 12:06 pm to ShortyRob
Posted on 11/4/18 at 12:06 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
we are thin as frick on that side of the ball
Even w Leonard and Guice we were thin relative to Bama, particularly when you factor in player development. Paper ratings eventually have to translate into on-field product. It really does seem like there are developmental issues on the offensive side of the ball that run deeper than just these last two years.
1
Posted on 11/4/18 at 12:08 pm to doctatigah
quote:Yep. Put it this way.
Even w Leonard and Guice we were thin relative to Bama, particularly when you factor in player development. Paper ratings eventually have to translate into on-field product. It really does seem like there are developmental issues on the offensive side of the ball that run deeper than just these last two years.
With LF and DG, we still were fielding a QB who would have been 3rd string on Bama's team. None of our WRs during that time would have started for Bama. MAYBE 1 or 2 of our OL would have started or been on the two deep.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News